We surveyed 85 HR professionals across 80+ UK organisations - from startups to enterprises with 27,000 employees. We asked about budgets, gift types, what's getting in the way, and whether anyone's actually measuring whether any of this works.
The short version? Most organisations believe gifting helps retention. Almost none can prove it. And over half are still doing the whole thing by hand.
Here's what the data says. For the full breakdown by company size, industry, and with actionable frameworks, download the complete UK Gifting & Recognition Benchmarks Report 2026.
Huggg surveyed 85 HR professionals across 80+ UK organisations between Q4 2025 and Q1 2026. Respondents included Chief People Officers, Heads of People, VPs of HR, Reward Managers, and People Ops leads. The survey was distributed via email and LinkedIn to HR professionals across all company sizes and industries. Results are self-reported and represent the respondent's knowledge of their organisation's gifting practices.
We heard from Chief People Officers, Heads of People, VPs of HR, Reward Managers, and People Ops leads at organisations including Balfour Beatty, WPP, Just Eat Takeaway, Monzo, Lazard, New Look, Dojo, De La Rue, Leeds Building Society, and Navan.
The sample spans every company size:
Tech & Software leads the industry breakdown at 32%, followed by Professional Services (24%), Hospitality & F&B (13%), and Healthcare & Pharma (8%).
The most common employee gifting spend in the UK is £50 to £200 per employee per year. Just over half of respondents (52.9%) fall into that band. Another 23.5% spend under £50 per head.
At the other end, just 3.5% spend between £500 and £1,000. Nobody in our survey goes above £1,000.
For context, SHRM's Employee Recognition Survey puts the ideal investment in recognition at around 1-2% of payroll. For a UK employee on £35,000, that's £350 to £700. According to Huggg's 2026 UK Employee Gifting Benchmarks, most organisations are spending well below this international benchmark.
Yes - but not how you'd expect.
Micro companies (1-50 employees): 35% spend under £50 | 40% spend £50-£200 | 15% spend £200+
Small companies (51-250): 22% spend under £50 | 63% spend £50-£200 | 7% spend £200+
Mid-market (251-1,000): 11% spend under £50 | 58% spend £50-£200 | 16% spend £200+
Enterprise (1,000+): 31% spend under £50 | 38% spend £50-£200 | 18% spend £200+
Small companies (51-250 employees) cluster heavily in the £50-£200 range - nearly two-thirds sit there. But at enterprise level, almost a third spend less than £50 per head. The total budget might be bigger, but it gets spread across so many people that the per-person amount often ends up smaller than at a company with 100 employees.
Bigger headcount doesn't mean more generous. It often means more diluted.
The full report breaks this down with detailed cross-tabulations by company size and industry - download it here.
The more revealing stat is what organisations spend on gifting platforms. 55.3% spend nothing. Zero. They're doing it all manually - picking gifts, placing orders, tracking who got what.
At micro and small companies, that rises to 67-70%. Even at enterprise level, 31% don't have a gifting programme at all.
That's not a technology adoption problem. That's a whole category that hasn't landed yet. If you're in this group, you don't need complex software - you need something that's free to use, doesn't require addresses, and takes minutes to set up.
Most UK organisations split their gifting budget across calendar events, milestones, and behaviour recognition - but nearly 40% put the majority into scheduled, predictable events.
We asked how budget is split across three areas: calendar events (birthdays, Christmas), milestones (promotions, anniversaries), and behaviour/performance recognition.
Only 19.8% prioritise recognising in-the-moment behaviour. This makes sense from an admin perspective - birthdays don't require manager judgement. But they're also the least personalised, least impactful form of recognition.
Gallup's research consistently shows that the recognition that actually moves the needle is frequent, timely, and tied to specific behaviours - not dates on a calendar. Our guide to the science of gifting explores why this matters.
Gift vouchers are the most common employee gift type in the UK (43.5%), but they don't perform best for retention - cash performs worst at just 20% perceived impact.
Here's how each gift type performs for retention:
When we cross-referenced gift type against perceived retention impact, every type of tangible gift scored between 47% and 52% for significant or moderate impact. Cash? Just 20%. Not close. Not even in the same postcode.
This aligns with Kube et al. (2012, American Economic Review), who found that gift exchange creates stronger motivation in the workplace than cash equivalents. A thoughtful gift feels different from money. And that difference shows up in whether people feel it matters.
Research from Steffel & LeBoeuf (2014, Journal of Consumer Psychology) also found that recipients consistently prefer gifts they can choose themselves - even when the pre-selected option is objectively "better." Choice signals trust and respect. It's why platforms like Huggg's Gift with Choice consistently outperform the "we picked something for you" approach.
Budget constraints are the number one challenge overall (58.8%), but the real story is how challenges shift dramatically depending on company size.
Three things jump out:
Micro companies care most about finding gifts people actually want (45%). They're small, personal, and gift-shopping manually. The problem isn't motivation - it's curation. Platforms like Huggg solve this by giving small teams access to a curated range across eight categories - from coffee shops and dining to retail and experiences - without needing enterprise software.
Mid-market companies have a manager problem. Inconsistent manager participation spikes to 68% at companies with 251-1,000 employees - nearly seven times higher than micro companies. This is the scale where you can't rely on one person doing all the gifting. You need managers to participate. And they're not. Huggg's plans include team budgets and one-click sending designed for exactly this.
Enterprise companies feel the pain of geography. Scaling across remote and hybrid locations is their standout challenge (38%). Budget pressure actually eases slightly. The problem isn't money - it's logistics. Huggg's address-free gifting removes this barrier entirely.
The full report includes the complete challenge matrix by company size and a comparison of manual gifters versus platform users - download the report for the detailed breakdown.
65.9% of UK HR professionals believe their gifting programme positively impacts retention, with a clear dose-response relationship to spending - but only 2.1% have actually measured it.
42.4% say that impact is significant or moderate. And there's a clear correlation with spending:
Organisations spending £200-£500 per employee are 47% more likely to believe gifting impacts retention than those spending under £50. At £500-£1,000, every single respondent believes it works.
By company size, mid-market (251-1,000 employees) is the sweet spot - 63% report significant or moderate impact, compared to just 31% at enterprise level.
Here's the sobering part. When we asked whether organisations have actually measured retention improvement from their gifting programme:
66% believe it works. 2.1% can prove it.
Most HR teams see it in the reactions. The thank-you messages. The general vibe. But when it comes to building a business case for the CFO? They've got nothing.
This mirrors findings from the CIPD's 2023 Reward Management Survey: while 89% of organisations offer some form of recognition, only 34% evaluate whether it actually works.
Only 1.6% of UK organisations formally track ROI on their gifting programme - even at enterprise level, not a single respondent does it formally.
The "want to but don't know how" group is the most interesting. They're the most enthusiastic believers in gifting's impact (83% believe it works) - but they can't prove it to anyone else. The full report includes a simple measurement framework for this group. Download it here.
For a deeper look at how to calculate and present gifting ROI, see our guide to corporate gifting ROI.
55.3% of organisations manage gifting manually. At smaller companies, it's 70%. This isn't because people don't value recognition. It's because the available tools haven't felt worth switching for. If you're in this group, you don't need a complex platform - you need something that's free to use, doesn't require addresses, and takes minutes.
Nearly 40% of budgets go to scheduled events. The research on recognition is clear: frequent, in-the-moment recognition has a bigger impact. Even shifting a chunk of your Christmas budget to spontaneous "thank you" moments could make a real difference. See our employee recognition scheme guide for a practical framework.
20% perceived retention impact versus 47-52% for every other gift type. If cash bonuses are your main recognition tool, the data says they're the least effective approach. This aligns with academic research from Kube et al. (2012) in the American Economic Review.
At 251-1,000 employees, 68% cite inconsistent manager participation. At this scale, recognition has to come from managers. And they need tools that make it ridiculously easy - nudges, pre-loaded budgets, one-click sending. Huggg's plans are designed for exactly this, with recognition budgets that make manager-led gifting take 30 seconds.
45% of micro-companies say their biggest challenge is finding gifts people actually want. They don't need an enterprise platform. They need a curated selection that takes the guesswork out. Read our gifts for employees guide for more ideas.
Track three things: how many gifts were sent this quarter, retention rates among recipients versus non-recipients, and manager adoption rates. Our corporate gifting ROI guide walks through the full measurement framework.
That puts you ahead of 98.4% of the organisations in this survey.
This blog covers the highlights. The full UK Gifting & Recognition Benchmarks Report 2026 includes detailed cross-tabulations by company size and industry, a comparison of manual gifters versus platform users, budget allocation versus challenge analysis, and a practical measurement framework for proving ROI.
According to Huggg's 2026 UK Employee Gifting Benchmarks survey of 85 HR professionals, 52.9% of UK organisations spend between £50 and £200 per employee per year on gifting. 23.5% spend under £50. Bigger companies don't necessarily spend more per head - enterprise organisations are almost as likely to spend under £50 as mid-market companies are to spend over £200. The international benchmark from SHRM suggests 1-2% of payroll, meaning most UK companies are underinvesting relative to global norms.
Budget constraints are the number one challenge overall (58.8%), but this varies significantly by company size. At mid-market companies (251-1,000 employees), inconsistent manager participation dominates at 68% - nearly seven times higher than at micro-companies. At micro-companies (1-50 employees), finding the right gifts is the top concern at 45%. Enterprise companies (1,000+ employees) struggle most with scaling gifting across remote and hybrid locations (38%).
65.9% of UK HR professionals surveyed in Huggg's 2026 benchmarks believe gifting positively impacts retention. Mid-market companies report the strongest impact (63% significant or moderate). There's also a clear dose-response: organisations spending £200-£500 per employee are 47% more likely to report positive retention impact than those spending under £50. However, only 2.1% have formally measured this improvement - creating a significant gap between belief and evidence.
Tangible gifts and mixed approaches score 47-52% for significant or moderate retention impact. Cash scores just 20% - making it the least effective gift type by a wide margin. Research from Kube et al. (2012) in the American Economic Review supports this: gift exchange creates stronger workplace motivation than cash equivalents. Giving employees a choice of gifts also aligns with consumer psychology research showing recipients prefer autonomy in gift selection.
Only 1.6% of UK organisations formally track ROI on their gifting programme, according to Huggg's 2026 benchmarks survey. Even at enterprise level (1,000+ employees), no respondents track ROI formally. 17.7% want to track ROI but don't know how - this group peaks at mid-market companies and are the most enthusiastic believers in gifting's impact (83% believe it works). For a practical measurement framework, see Huggg's corporate gifting ROI guide.
55.3% of UK organisations manage gifting manually with no dedicated platform. At micro and small companies, that rises to 67-70%. Gift vouchers are the most common gift type at 43.5%, followed by pre-selected specific gifts at 32.9%. Only 20% give recipients an actual choice of gifts - despite research showing recipients prefer choosing their own gift.
The most common range is £50-£200 per employee per year (52.9% of organisations surveyed). However, SHRM's international benchmark recommends investing 1-2% of payroll in recognition - for a UK employee on £35,000, that's £350-£700. Most UK organisations are spending well below this level, suggesting significant room to increase gifting investment, particularly given the strong correlation between higher spend and perceived retention impact.
Small companies (51-250 employees) cluster in the £50-£200 spend range, struggle most with finding the right gifts, and are more likely to manage gifting manually. Mid-market companies (251-1,000) face a unique manager participation challenge (68% cite it as their top issue). Enterprise companies (1,000+) often spend less per head despite larger total budgets, and cite remote/hybrid logistics as their standout challenge. See the full cross-tabulations in the UK Gifting Benchmarks Report 2026.